Redemption, Part I
Jul. 3rd, 2014 08:20 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've newly watched this ep again, and it's reminded me how odd it seems. Specifically Jack's comment, 'Over my rotting corpse'. That seems so out of character, so out of left field, to me it makes me pull up short every time I watch the ep.
So, SG peeps. What's your take on this? I can come up with a couple of reasons why this line might exist at a stretch, but no matter how hard I try to justify it, I always come down to one thing: lazy writing to set up the conflict later in the ep.
Open to any and all interpretations :-)
So, SG peeps. What's your take on this? I can come up with a couple of reasons why this line might exist at a stretch, but no matter how hard I try to justify it, I always come down to one thing: lazy writing to set up the conflict later in the ep.
Open to any and all interpretations :-)
no subject
Date: 2014-07-05 03:05 pm (UTC)I was thinking in terms of what was clearly stated in canon, though, and I definitely get what you're saying -- I'm not sure that line is fully supported. It might even be undermined by 'The Tomb' and 'Watergate.'
no subject
Date: 2014-07-06 01:59 am (UTC)HAMMOND
Colonel Checkov feels that as a symbol of our joint efforts, a Russian officer should be assigned to join SG-1.
O'NEILL
Over my rotting corpse, Sir.
HAMMOND
Colonel…
O'NEILL
I'm sorry, did I say that out loud?
Now. Replace "rotting corpse" with "dead body", and the exchange doesn't clank nearly as much...
no subject
Date: 2014-07-06 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-06 11:25 pm (UTC)